ImpactMojo Workshop Series • Governance and Development in South Asia
75-90 Minutes
Workshop 1: Foundations of Political Economy Analysis
Target Audience: Policy analysts, development practitioners, governance specialists, researchers, and public administration professionals
Prerequisites: Basic understanding of economics and public policy
Materials Needed: Policy documents, case study materials, institutional analysis framework
Learning Objectives
By the end of this workshop, participants will be able to:
Apply political economy frameworks to analyze policy outcomes in Indian contexts
Identify key actors, institutions, and incentive structures in policy processes
Analyze the role of formal and informal institutions in shaping development outcomes
Evaluate power dynamics and their impact on policy design and implementation
Design institutional reforms that account for political economy constraints
Part 1: What is Political Economy?
20 minutes
Core Definition
Political Economy is the study of how political and economic institutions interact to shape policy outcomes, resource allocation, and development trajectories. It examines the incentives, institutions, and power relationships that determine who gets what, when, and how.
The Three Pillars of Political Economy Analysis
Actors & Interests
Who are the key players?
Political leaders and parties
Bureaucrats and civil servants
Business groups and organized labor
Civil society and interest groups
International actors (donors, investors)
What do they want? What are their preferences and constraints?
Institutions & Rules
What are the rules of the game?
Constitutional framework
Electoral systems and party structures
Administrative procedures
Informal norms and practices
Legal and regulatory framework
How do formal and informal rules shape behavior?
Power & Incentives
How are decisions actually made?
Resource control and access
Information asymmetries
Coalition building and bargaining
Electoral and bureaucratic incentives
Rent-seeking opportunities
What motivates different actors? Who has leverage?
Key Insight: Why Good Policies Sometimes Fail
Political economy helps explain why technically sound policies often fail in implementation. Success depends not just on economic efficiency, but on whether the policy is politically feasible given existing institutions, interests, and power dynamics.
Part 2: Indian Political Economy - Historical Foundations
25 minutes
🇮🇳 Case Study: The Political Economy of India's Economic Reforms
The Puzzle: Why did India's economic liberalization happen in 1991, not earlier or later? What explains the particular pattern of reforms?
Coalition Dynamics: Crisis created space for reform constituency
Analysis Exercise: Reform Trajectory (10 minutes)
Question: Why were some sectors (telecommunications, software) liberalized faster than others (agriculture, labor)?
Fast Reform Sectors
Telecommunications, IT Services, Aviation
Limited organized opposition
Clear efficiency gains
Export potential
New technology = new actors
Slow Reform Sectors
Agriculture, Labor Laws, Land
Strong vested interests
Electoral consequences
State vs. federal jurisdiction
Ideological resistance
Reflection: How do different actor configurations and institutional arrangements explain these varying reform speeds? What does this tell us about the political feasibility of future reforms?
Part 3: Institutional Analysis Framework
20 minutes
Formal vs. Informal Institutions
Formal Institutions
Informal Institutions
Indian Examples
Constitutional Rules Written laws, regulations, procedures
Unwritten Norms Conventions, traditions, social practices
RTI Act vs. bureaucratic resistance culture
Electoral Systems FPTP, constituency boundaries, ECI rules
Political Culture Caste networks, patron-client relations
Coordination Problems: Difficult to change multiple institutions simultaneously
Legitimacy: Institutions derive power from social acceptance
Example: India's federal structure (formal) interacts with regional party systems (informal) to create particular patterns of coalition politics and policy bargaining.
Part 4: Power Dynamics and Policy Making
15 minutes
Mapping Power: Who Really Decides?
Three Faces of Power (Lukes Framework)
1. Decision-Making Power (Observable)
Who participates in formal policy processes?
Who wins when there are conflicts?
Indian Example: Parliamentary debates, cabinet decisions
2. Agenda-Setting Power (Mobilization of Bias)
Who determines what issues get discussed?
What topics are kept off the agenda?
Indian Example: Media influence, party manifestos, bureaucratic gatekeeping
3. Ideological Power (Shaping Preferences)
Who defines the terms of debate?
What counts as legitimate policy options?
Indian Example: Development discourse, "Gujarat model," "minimum government, maximum governance"
Power Mapping Exercise (10 minutes)
Scenario: Implementation of the National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013
Your Task: Identify actors and their power sources for each face of power:
Power Type
Key Actors
Power Sources
Strategies Used
Decision-Making
Parliament, Supreme Court, State Govts
Constitutional authority
Legislation, judicial review
Agenda-Setting
NAC, Media, Civil Society
Information, mobilization
Public campaigns, research
Ideological
Economists, Think Tanks
Expertise, credibility
Framing debates, legitimacy
Part 5: Practical Application - Political Economy Assessment